Preferensi Konsumen terhadap Beras Berlabel Jaminan Varietas (BBJV) untuk Hipa 8, Ciherang dan Inpari 13

Siti Dewi Indrasari, Purwaningsih Purwaningsih, Erni Apriyati, Shinta Dewi Ardhiyanti

Abstract


The objectives of this research was to study the consumer acceptance to variety assurance rice labelled  (VARL) wihich is produced by  “Kopkarlittan” of Indonesian Center for Rice Research (ICRR). The research was conducted on September to November 2013. The respondents were asked to answer the question in questionaire and assessing the rice and cooked rice presented. The preference assessment was carried out to every rice atributes  such as aroma, color, shape, wholeness, cleaness and general acceptance (like or dislike). The same assessment was also carried out to the cooked rice with different atributes such as aroma, color, translucency, softness, taste and general acceptance. The rice used were Hipa 8 variety which is represent aromatic rice and Ciherang and Inpari 23 represent non aromatic rice. Those rice were produced by “Kopkarlittan” ICRR. As controlled were used non variety assurance labelled rice (NVARL) which were bought from two modern market LM and C in Jakarta. The organoleptic data were analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and presented in decriptive way. In general the respondents  stated that VARL products is better than other NVARL product in term of shape, wholeness, cleaness, taste of cooked rice, nutritional and functional quality. Other respondents stated that VARL products is the same with NVARL products in term of color. In general the consumers in Jakarta, Bandung and Yogyakarta stated  that  there is no preference different based on color, aroma, shape, wholeness and cleaness of aromatic rice sold in LM and C modern market, except general accetance atribute of Hipa 8 variety. The consumers also stated that there is no preference different to Hipa 8 cooked rice based on aroma, color, translucency, softness, taste and general acceptance. But there is preference different of aromatics cooked rice sold in LM  modern market based on color, translucency, softness and taste atributes. In general consumers in Jakarta, Bandung and Yogyakarta stated that  there is no preference different of  non aromatic rice and cooked rice sold in LM, C modern market dan Inpari 13 variety.

Keywords


Rice preferences; cooked rice preferences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adeye, J.A., E.P. Navesero,O.J. Ariyo and S.A. Adeye. 2010. Consumer Preference for Rice Consumption in Nigeria. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Creative Arts, 5(1): 26-36.

Akaeze, Q.O. 2010. Consumer preference for imported rice in Nigeria – perceived quality differences or habit persistence ?. Unpublished Master Thesis. Michigan State University.

Azabagaoglu, M.O. dan O. Gaytancioglu. 2009. Analyzing consumer preference to different rice varieties in Turkey. Agricultura Tropica Et Subtropica, 42 (3):118-125.

Damarjati, D.S. and M. Oka. 1989. Evaluation of consumer preference for rice quality characteristics at urban area in Indonesia. Paper presented at the 12th ASEAN Seminar on Grain Postharvest Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Danso-Abbeam, G., M. Armed, and F. Baidon. 2014. Determinants of Consumer Preference for Local Rice in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. International Journal of Education and Sosial Science. Vol. 1. No. 2. September. p : 114-122.

Direktorat Jendral Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Hasil Pertanian dan Lembaga Penelitian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Institut Pertanian Bogor. 2007. Program Pengembangan Beras Berlabel di Indonesia. Jakarta.

Diako, C., E. Sakyi-Dawson, B. Bediako-Amoa , F.K. Saalia, and J.T. Manful. 2008. Consumer perceptions, knowledge and preferences for aromatic rice types in Ghana. Nature and Science 8 (12): 12-19.

Galawat, F. and M. Yabe. 2010. Assesing consumer’s preferences for local rice in Brunei: An application of choice model. J. ISSAAS.16 (2): 104-115.

Hogg, A. and S. Kalafatis. 1992. Current trends in the United Kingdom Market for rice. Proceedings of the Prospects for Rice Consumption in Europe Symposium. Verona. Italy.

Indrasari, S.D. dan M.O. Adnyana. 2007. Preferensi Konsumen terhadap Beras Merah sebagai Pangan Fungsional. Iptek Tanaman Pangan. Vol 2. No 2 : 227-241.

Kassali, R., R.O. Kareem, O. Oluwasola, and O.M. Ohaegbulam. 2010. Analysis of demand for rice in Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa. 12(2): 263-278.

Lancon, F. O. Erenstein, S.O. Akande, S.O. Titilola, G. Akpokodje and O.O. Ogundele. 2003. Imported rice, retailing and purchasing in Nigeria: A survey. In the Nigerian Rice Economy in a Competitive World: Constraints, Opportunities and Strategic Choices. West Africa Rice Development Association (WARDA).

Larmond, E. 1982. Laboartory methods for sensory evaluation of food. Res. Dept. Agric. Pub. Ottawa, Canada.

Musa, M. N. Othman, and F.A. Fatah. 2011. Determinants of consumers purchasing behavior for rice in Malaysia. American International Journal of Contemporary Research. Vol 1. No. 3 : 159 - 167.

Opoku, R.A. and P.A.K. Akorli. 2009. The preference gap: Ghanaian consumers’ attitudes toward local and imported products. African Journa; of Bussiness Management. 3(8):350-357.

PP 69 tahun 1999 tentang Label dan Iklan Pangan

Rahmat, R., R. Thahir, and M. Gummert. 2006. The empirical relationship between price and quality of rice market level in West Java. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science. 7: 27-33.

Suismono dan Darniadi. 2010. Prospek Beras Berlabel SNI. Pangan. Vol 19. No 1. Maret. P: 30-39.

Suismono, Sudaryono, dan Acep Ramli. 2009. Kajian beras berlabel di kabupaten Subang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Padi 2008. Buku 4. Inovasi Teknologi Padi Mengantisipasi Perubahan Iklim Global Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan (Ed : A. Setyono et al.). Hal : 1715-1725.

Suwannaporn, P. and A. Linnamenn. 2008. Consumer preferences and buying criteria in rice: a study to identify market strategy for Thailand Jasmine Rice Export. Journal of Sensory Studies. 23: 1-13.

Syahrir, S. A. A. Taridala, dan Bahari. Preferensi Beras Berlabel. Agriekonomika. Vol 4. No 1. April 2015. Hal : 10-21.

Tomlins, K.I., J.T. Manful, P. Larwer, and L. Hammond. 2005. Urban consumer preferences and sensory evaluation of locally produced and imported rice in West Africa.

Toquero, Z.F. 1991. Consumer demand for rice grain quality in rice grain marketing and quality issues. Selected Paper from The International Rice Reserach Conference, 27-31 August 1990, Seoul, Korea, IRRI. Manila. p. 37-46.

Unnevehr, L.J. , B.O. Juliano, and C.M. Perez. 1985. Consumer demand for rice grain quality in Southeast Asia. Papers presented at the International Rice Research Conference. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). Manila. Philippines.

UU No. 7 tahun 1996 tentang Pangan.

Wibowo, P., S.D. Indrasari, dan D.D. Handoko. 2007. Preferensi Konsumen terhadap Karakteristik Beras dan Kesesuaiannya dengan Standar Mutu Beras di Jawa Tengah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Padi. Buku 2. Seminar Apresiasi Hasil Penelitian Padi Menunjang P2BN. (Ed: B. Suprihatno et al). Hal : 821-833.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jpptp.v35n3.2016.p173-180

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


P-ISSN: 2541-5166
E-ISSN: 2541-5174
Accredited No.148/M/KPT/2020 by Kemenristek/BRIN


Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan has been indexed by:

       


Editorial Office

Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Tanaman Pangan
Jln Merdeka no. 147, Bogor 16111, Indonesia
Phone/Fax.: +62-251-8312755 
E-mail: publikasi_puslitbangtan@litbang.pertanian.go.id
Website: http://pangan.litbang.pertanian.go.id

View My Stats