Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Hortikultura adalah Jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hortikultura, Jurnal Hortikultura memuat penelitian tentang Hortikultura yaitu Tanaman Sayuran, Tanaman Buah Tropika, Tanaman Hias ataupun Tanaman Buah Sub Tropika.

Jurnal Hortikultura (J. Hort.) memuat artikel primer yang bersumber langsung dari hasil penelitian hortikultura yang belum pernah dipublikasikan.

Jurnal Hortikultura dalam setahun terbit sebanyak 2 kali, yaitu setiap 6 bulan sekali. Selain Peneliti dari lingkup Kementerian Pertanian, kami juga membuka dari luar untuk penelitiannya bisa kami terbitkan di Jurnal kami. Jurnal Hortikultura telah Terakreditasi oleh Kemenristekdikti untuk  periode 2016-2020, dengan No. Sertifikat 21/E/KPT/2018, Tanggal 9 Juli 2018.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Kesesuaian naskah untuk publikasi di Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort) dinilai oleh Mitra Bestari dan Dewan Editor. Semua proses peninjauan dilakukan secara blind review. Ketua Editor menangani semua korespondensi dengan penulis dan membuat keputusan akhir apakah makalah dianjurkan untuk penerimaan, penolakan, atau perlu dikembalikan ke penulis untuk revisi.

Ketua Editor dan Editor Bagian akan mengevaluasi dokumen yang diajukan pada langkah prakualifikasi untuk kesesuaian proses penelaahan lebih lanjut. Naskah akan dievaluasi oleh dua atau tiga Mitra Bestari yang dipilih oleh Ketua Editor dan Editor Bagian. Mitra Bestari harus memeriksa naskah dan mengembalikannya dengan rekomendasi mereka kepada Kepala Editor atau Editor Bagian sesegera mungkin, biasanya dalam waktu 2 minggu. Jika salah satu dari Mitra Bestari merekomendasikan penolakan, Ketua Editor akan meminta Mitra Bestari ketiga/tambahan atau Editor Bagian untuk menentukan penerimaan atau penolakan makalah.

Makalah yang perlu direvisi akan dikembalikan ke penulis, dan penulis harus kembali mengirimkan revisi naskah ke Ketua Editor melalui OJS Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort). Ketua Editor mengirim naskah yang telah direvisi oleh penulis kepada Editor Bagian untuk memeriksa apakah naskah direvisi sudah seperti yang disarankan oleh Mitra Bestari. Editor Bagian dapat memberikan rekomendasi kepada Ketua Editor bahwa naskah tersebut harus kembali ke penulis, diterima, atau ditolak dalam waktu 2 minggu. Setelah penerimaan oleh Editor Bagian, naskah diteruskan ke editor teknis tata bahasa dan tata letak untuk pertemuan Dewan Editor. Ketua Editor akan mengirim surat penerimaan dan memberitahukan publikasi terlampir dengan cetak ulang naskah kepada penulis.

Ada tiga langkah dari proses revisi oleh penulis: 1) revisi naskah untuk mengakomodasi saran Mitra Bestari dalam waktu 2-4 minggu; 2) revisi untuk mengakomodasi saran Editor Bagian  dalam waktu 2-4 minggu (jika ada); dan 3) revisi untuk mengakomodasi saran keputusan Dewan Editor dalam waktu 1 minggu (jika ada). Manuskrip yang melebihi batas waktu revisi akan ditarik. Penulis dapat meminta perpanjangan kepada Dewan Editor sebelum revisi berakhir. Interval waktu dari tanggal naskah dimasukkan hingga diterima untuk publikasi bervariasi, tergantung pada waktu yang dibutuhkan untuk review dan revisi.

Umumnya naskah ditolak dengan 3 alasan : 1) Topik naskah tidak cocok dengan lingkup jurnal dan mungkin lebih cocok untuk publikasi lain. 2) Substansi naskah tidak memenuhi standar Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort); data mungkin tidak lengkap; metodologi yang digunakan tidak tepat; kurangnya kebaruan dan tidak ada kemajuan untuk perkembangan pengetahuan yang ada; atau tidak ada konsistensi antara tujuan, desain penelitian/metode, bukti, dan kesimpulan. 3) Naskah tidak ditulis mengikuti pedoman Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort) dalam intruksi untuk Penulis. Naskah seperri ini mungkin akan ditolak tanpa proses review. Naskah juga dapat ditolak dalam proses peninjauan jika Penulis tidak merevisi naskah seperti yang disarankan oleh Mitra Bestari dan Dewan Editor, atau juga tidak memberikan tanggapan/sanggahan terhadap saran.

Jika naskah ditolak, penulis akan diinformasikan oleh Ketua Editor dengan pernyataan beserta alasan penolakan. Penulis dapat mengajukan banding ke Ketua Editor jika dipercaya penilaian tidak adil dan melampirkan alasan penulis. Ketua Editor akan meninjau dan membahas ulang alasan dengan Editor Bagian yang bertanggung jawab untuk naskah, dan kemudian memutuskan apakah akan menerima atau menolak banding.

Cetak ulang dari semua naskah akan diberikan kepada penulis koresponden. Cetak ulang harus dibaca dengan seksama, diperiksa terhadap kesalahan pengetikan, dan koreksi dapat segera dikembalikan. Penulis yang mengirimkan naskah harus memahami dan setuju bahwa hak cipta dari naskah diterbitkan dipegang oleh Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort). Pernyataan untuk melepaskan hak cipta kepada Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort) dinyatakan dalam Perjanjian Pengalihan Hak Cipta. Hak cipta mencakup hak eksklusif untuk mereproduksi, mendistribusikan, dan menjual setiap bagian dari artikel jurnal dalam semua bentuk dan media. Reproduksi setiap bagian dari jurnal ini, penyimpanan dalam database dan transmisi dalam bentuk atau media lain hanya dengan izin tertulis dari Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort).

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Hortikultura diterbitkan oleh Puslitbang Hortikultura, Badan Litbang Pertanian, Kementerian Pertanian, terbit 2 (dua) kali dalam setahun, setiap bulan Juni dan Desember.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

Jurnal Hortikultura (J.Hort) menggunakan sistem LOCKSS untuk menciptakan sistem pengarsipan yang terdistribusi bagi partisipasi perpustakaan dan memungkinkan perpustakaan untuk membuat arsip permanen jurnal untuk tujuan pelestarian dan restorasi. Selanjutnya...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Journal of Horticulture (J.Hort) is an agricultural science publishes articles and short communications in horticulture fields such as vegetable plants, fruits, tropical fruits, and ornamental crop plants. J.Hort covers wide range of all life forms topics including phytopathology, entomology, social economics, agronomy, biotechnology, and breeding.

Journal of Horticulture (J.Hort) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the editorial board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Indonesian Center for Horticulture Research and Development). This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed J.Hort is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and  respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Indonesian Center for Horticulture Research and Development as publisher of J.Hort takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Indonesian Center for Horticulture Research and Development of Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.


Publication decisions

The editor of the J.Hort is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.


Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.


Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.


Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

 

 

Article Processing Charges

Penyerahan naskah, tinjauan, penyuntingan, penerbitan, pemeliharaan, pengarsipan, dan akses tidak akan dikenakan biaya dan tersedia secara GRATIS untuk seluruh isi

 

Plagiarism Check

Skrining plagiarisme akan dilakukan oleh dewan editor menggunakan Grammarly plagiarism checker dan layanan plagiarism screening Crosscheck oleh iThenticate

 

 

Copy Editing and Proofreading

Setiap naskah yang diterima akan diedit menggunakan Grammarly writing-enhancement oleh dewan editor

 

References Management

Setiap naskah yang dikirimkan harus menggunakan perangkat lunak manajemen referensi seperti Mendeley.

 

Acreditation Certificate