Dampak Perubahan Harga Pangan terhadap Tingkat Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga di Indonesia

Rita Yuliana, nFN Harianto, Sri Hartoyo, Muhammad Firdaus

Abstract


English
The most important people's welfare related food problem is increasing food prices. Food price induced welfare change varies by household groups, either by location (urban/rural), poverty status (poor/non-poor), and souces of incomes (agriculture/non-agricultural). The sources of the welfare change may also vary by food categories. This study aims to evaluate changes in household welfare in Indonesia by household groups and the contribution of food categories. The household welfare was measured with the Compensating Variation which was computed by using the Hicksian compensated price elasticities obtained from the estimated Linear Approximation Almost Ideal Demand System using the National Socio-Economic Survey March 2016 data. The results showed that in March 2016, welfare losses in all household groups, in urban areas higher than in rural areas, in poorer households higher than non-poor, in agricultural households higher than non-agricultural and the contribution of each food group to the decline in welfare levels varies among individual household groups. The largest contributor is food prices. Rice is the largest contributor for the rural, the poor and the agricultural households. Animal products, fruit, prepared food and beverage and cigarettes categories are the main contributors for the urban, the not poor and the non-agricultural households.


Indonesian
Permasalahan pangan utama yang berkaitan dengan tingkat kesejahteraan masyarakat adalah kenaikan harga pangan. Perubahan tingkat kesejahteraan akibat kenaikan harga pangan berbeda menurut kelompok seperti menurut tempat tinggal (perkotaan/perdesaan), status kemiskinan (miskin/tidak miskin), sumber utama penghasilan rumah tangga (pertanian/nonpertanian). Demikian pula kontribusi masing-masing kategori pangan terhadap perubahan tingkat kesejahteraan berbeda pada kelompok rumah tangga sama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi perubahan tingkat kesejahteraan rumah tangga di Indonesia menurut kelompok rumah tangga dan kontribusi kategori pangan terhadap perubahan tingkat kesejahteraan tersebut. Perubahan kesejahteraan diukur dengan Compensating Variation berdasarkan elastisitas harga terkompensasi Hicksian yang diperoleh dari model permintaan Linear Approximation Almost Ideal Demand System dengan data Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional periode Maret 2016. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada Maret 2016, terjadi penurunan kesejahteraan pada semua kelompok rumah tangga, di perkotaan lebih tinggi daripada di perdesaan, pada rumah tangga miskin lebih tinggi dari pada tidak miskin, pada rumah tangga pertanian lebih tinggi dari pada nonpertanian. Kelompok makanan berkontribusi tertinggi terhadap penurunan tingkat kesejahteraan rumah tangga secara umum. Beras berkontribusi tertinggi dalam penurunan tingkat kesejahteraan kelompok rumah tangga perdesaan, miskin, dan pertanian. Kategori pangan hewani, kelompok buah-buahan, makanan dan minuman jadi serta rokok berkontribusi tertinggi untuk kelompok rumah tangga di perkotaan, tidak miskin dan nonpertanian.

Keywords


food; price; welfare; household; pangan; harga; kesejahteraan; rumah tangga

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackah C, Appleton S. 2007. Food price changes and consumer welfare in Ghana in the 1990s. CREDIT Research Paper No. 07/03. Nottingham (UK): University of Nottingham.

Ariningsih E. 2002. Perilaku konsumsi pangan sumber protein hewani dan nabati sebelum dan pada masa krisis ekonomi di Jawa [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Attanasio O, Di Maro V, Lechene V, Phillips D. 2013. Welfare consequences of food prices increases: Evidence from rural Mexico. J of Dev Econ. 104:136-151.

Banks J, Blundell R, Lewbel A. 1997. Quadratic engel curve and consumer demand. The review of economics and statistics.79(4):527-539.

Boughanmi H, Al Shamakhi A, Mbaga M, Kotagama H. 2014. Evaluation of the 2006-2008 food crisis on household welfare: The case of The Sultanate of Oman. Econ Research International. Vol. 2014, Article ID581638. Muscat (OM): Hindawi Pubishing Corporation.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016a. Indikator Ekonomi Maret 2016. Publikasi BPS [Internet]. [diunduh 2016 November 29]. Tersedia pada: http://www.bps.go.id.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016b. Pengeluaran untuk konsumsi penduduk Indonesia: berdasarkan hasil Susenas Maret 2016 (buku 1). Publikasi BPS [Internet]. [diunduh 2017 Januari 5]. Tersedia pada: http://www.bps.go.id.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016c. Laporan bulanan data sosial ekonomi (edisi 71 April 2016). Publikasi BPS [Internet]. [diunduh 2016 Desember 2]. Tersedia pada: http://www.bps.go.id.

Deaton A. 1990. Price elasticities from survey data: extensions and Indonesian results. Journal of Econometrics. 44(1990):281-309.

Deaton A, Muellbauer J. 1980a. Economics and consumer behavior. New York (US): Cambridge Univ Pr.

Deaton A, Muellbauer J. 1980b. An almost ideal demand system. Am Econ Rev. 70(3):312-326.

Dianarafah D. 1999. Analisis konsumsi pangan di Propinsi Jawa Timur [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Dybczak K, Toth P, Vonka D. 2014. Effects of price shocks on consumer demand: estimating the QUAIDS demand system on Czech household budget survey data. Czech J of Econand Finance. 64(6):476-500.

Fashogbon AE, Oni OA. 2013. Heterogeneity in rural household food demand and its determinants in Ondo State, Nigeria: An application of quadratic almost ideal demand system. J of Agric Science. 5(2):169-177.

Friedman J, Levinsohn J. 2002. The distributional impacts of Indonesia’s financial crisis on household welfare: a “rapid response” methodology. World Bank Economic Review. 16(3):397-423. Oxford (UK): Oxford Univ Pr.

Harianto. 1994. An empirical analysis of food demand in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study [Dissertation]. [Victoria (US)]: La Trobe Univ.

Harianto, Susila DAB. 2009. Permintaan beras rumah tangga petani padi. JAgribisnis dan Ekonomi Pertanian. 3(2):90-103.

Haq ZU, Nazli H, Meilke K. 2008. Implications of high food prices for poverty in Pakistan. AgricEcon. 39:477-484.

Huffman SK, Johnson SR. 2000. Re-evaluation of welfare changes during the transition in Poland. Working Paper 00-WP 255. Iowa (US): IowaState University.

Just RE, Hueth DL, Schmitz A. 2004. The welfare economics of public policy. A practical approach to project and policy evaluation. Cheltenham (GB) and Northampton (US): Edward Elgar.

Kane GQ, Tene GLM, Ambagna JJ, Piot-lepekit I, Sikod F. 2015. The impact of food price volatility on consumer welfare in Cameroon. WIDER Working Paper 013.

Kemalawaty M. 1999. Analisis konsumsi pangan sumber protein hewani di Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Aceh [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Le CQ. 2008. An empirical study of food demand in Vietnam. ASEAN Econ Bulletin. 25(3):283-292.

Lewbel A, Pendakur K. 2009. Tricks with Hicks: The EASI Demand System. Am Econ Rev. 99(3):827-863.

Martianto D. 1995. Konsumsi dan permintaan pangan hewani di berbagai provinsi di Indonesia [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Miranti A, Syaukat Y, Harianto. 2016. Pola konsumsi pangan rumah tangga di Provinsi Jawa Barat. J Agro Ekon. 34(1):67-80.

Moeis J. P. 2003. Indonesia food demand system: An analysis of the impacts of the economic crisis on household consumption and nutritional intake [Dissertation]. [Washington DC (US)]: The George Washington Univ.

Nicholson W, Snyder C. 2008. Microeconomic theory. basic principles and extensions. 10th ed. Ohio (US): South-Western, Thomson.

Nigel J, Bogahawatte C. 1990. Demand system of food using cross-section data: Evidence from Badulla District, Sri Lanka. Tropical Agric Research. 2:183-196.

Olivieri A. 2014. Estimation of consumption choices with the EASI demand system: Application to Italian data [Disertasi]. [Rome (IT)]: University of Modena and Reggio Emilia.

Osei-Asare YB, Eghan M. 2013. Food price inflation and consumer welfare in Ghana. International J of Food and Agric Econ. 1(1):27-39.

Pangaribowo EH, Tsegai D. 2011. Food demand analysis of Indonesian households with particular attention to the poorest. ZEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 151. Zentrum für Entwicklungstorschung, Center for DevResearch. Bonn (DE): University Bonn.

Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL. 2013. Microeconomics. 8th ed. New Jersey (US): Pearson Education.

Rachman HPS. 2001. Kajian pola konsumsi dan permintaan pangan di Kawasan Timur Indonesia [Disertasi]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Sahinli MA, Fidan H. 2012. Estimation of food demand in Turkey: Method of an almost ideal demand system. Qual Quant. 46:653-663.

Sari NA. 2016. Analisis pola konsumsi pangan daerah perkotaan dan pedesaan serta keterkaitannya dengan karakteristik sosial ekonomi di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. J Ekon dan Manaj Indonesia. 16(2):69-81.

Sheng TY, Shamsudin MN, Mohamed Z, Abdullah AM, Radam A. 2008. Complete demand system of food in Malaysia. Agri.Econ.-CZECH. 54(10):467-475.

Shittu AM, Obayelu OA, Salman KK. 2015. Welfare effects of policy-induced rising food prices on farm households in Nigeria. AGRODEP Working Paper 0010.

Song Z, Li L, Ma C. 2013. The EASI demand system: evidence from China household. MPRA Paper n. 48435.

Suharno. 2010. An almost ideal demand system for food based on cross section data: rural and urban East Java, Indonesia [dissertation]. [Göttingen (DE)]: Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.

Tash MNS, Shahraki J, Jangi SN. 2012. Estimating the almost ideal demand system model for rural households in Iran. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2(8):281-292.

Teklu T, Johnson SR. 1987. Demand systems from cross section data: An experiment for Indonesia. CARD Working Papers, Digital Repository@ Iowa State University.

Varian HR. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. 3rd ed. New York (US): W.W. Norton & Company.

Virgantari F. 2012. Analisis permintaan produk perikanan di Indonesia: suatu studi cross-sectional [Disertasi]. [Bogor (ID):] Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Wahyuni D, Purnastuti L, Mustofa. 2016. Analisis elastisitas tiga bahan pangan sumber protein hewani di Indonesia. Jurnal Economia. 12(1):43-53.

Widarjono A. 2012. Food and nutrient demand in Indonesia [Dissertation]. [Oklahoma (US)]: Oklahoma State University.

Widarjono A. 2013. Food demand in Yogyakarta: Susenas 2011. Kinerja. 17(2):104-118.

Widarjono A, Rucbha SM. 2016. Household food demand in Indonesia: A two-stage budgeting approach. J of Indonesia Econ and Bussiness. 31(2):163-177.

Widiasih SCL. 2009. Analisis konsumsi dan kebutuhan untuk konsumsi pangan di Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Jawa Tengah, dan Sulawesi Tenggara Tahun 2005-2015 [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Yuliana R. 2008. Evaluasi perubahan tingkat kesejahteraan rumah tangga sebagai dampak kenaikan harga BBM di Indonesia, periode Pebruari 2005 – Maret 2006 [Tesis]. [Depok (ID)]: Universitas Indonesia.

Yusdiyanto S. 2016. Pola konsumsi pangan rumah tangga miskin di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah [Tesis]. [Bogor (ID)]: Institut Pertanian Bogor.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jae.v37n1.2019.25-45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Agro Ekonomi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian
Kementerian Pertanian
Lt. III Gedung A.
Kawasan Inovasi Pertanian Cimanggu
Jl. Tentara Pelajar No. 3B, Kota Bogor 16111
Telp. (0251) 8333964 ext. 300-301, Faks.  (0251) 8314496
E-mail : jae.psekp@gmail.com
Website: http://pse.litbang.pertanian.go.id


Statistik Pengunjung


Google Scholar Scilit logo